From: "Digest" To: "OS/2GenAu Digest" Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 01:00:00 +1100 (EDT) Subject: [os2genau_digest] No. 227 Reply-To: Date:- 10 December 2001 Please reply to ianatos2site dot com to post to the list. 1================================================ Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 20:14:11 +0930 From: Leigh Bunting Subject: [os2genau] IBM Device Driver Page Guys, Any idea with this page has gone? The previous URL was: http://www.software.ibm dot com/os/warp/downloads/ -- Leigh Bunting Colonel Light Gardens South Australia 2============================================== Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 21:02:02 +1100 From: Ed Durrant Subject: Re: [os2genau] IBM Device Driver Page The Address is correct - it worked OK yesterday for me. I suspect the server may simply be down for maintenance, I suggest you try again tomorrow. Cheers/2 Ed. Leigh Bunting wrote: > > Guys, > > Any idea with this page has gone? The previous URL was: > > http://www.software.ibm dot com/os/warp/downloads/ > > -- > Leigh Bunting > Colonel Light Gardens > South Australia > > 3============================================== Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 21:03:30 +1100 From: Ed Durrant Subject: Re: [os2genau] IBM Device Driver Page Aha - found it - Direct link is:- http://www-4.ibm dot com/software/os/warp/downloads/ Leigh Bunting wrote: > > Guys, > > Any idea with this page has gone? The previous URL was: > > http://www.software.ibm dot com/os/warp/downloads/ > > -- > Leigh Bunting > Colonel Light Gardens > South Australia > > 4============================================== Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 20:28:32 +1030 From: Gregory Hicks Subject: Re: [os2genau] IBM Device Driver Page gone with - the wind? or perhaps a downed server? I'll chase over the next day or so leigh cheers/2 greg Leigh Bunting wrote: > Guys, > > Any idea with this page has gone? The previous URL was: > > http://www.software.ibm dot com/os/warp/downloads/ > > -- > Leigh Bunting > Colonel Light Gardens > South Australia > > 5============================================== Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 20:33:24 +0930 From: Leigh Bunting Subject: Re: [os2genau] Interesting bandwith tester 46.6Kbps Ed Durrant wrote: > Checkout this site > > http://www.activeenzymes dot com dot au/bandwidth/ > > Interestingly enough I get different values depending which > browser I use. > > > I'd be interested what others find. -- Leigh Bunting Colonel Light Gardens South Australia 6============================================== Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 20:53:14 +1030 From: Gregory Hicks Subject: Re: [os2genau] Interesting bandwith tester 13.8... vvveeerrryyy sssssslllllllllooooooowwwwwww Ed Durrant wrote: > Checkout this site > > http://www.activeenzymes dot com dot au/bandwidth/ > > Interestingly enough I get different values depending which > browser I use. > > If I use Netscape 4.61 I get 1.6 MB/S > > If I Use Mozilla 0.96 however, I get 2.2 MB/S reported > > Using Opera just give garbage (probably lack of JAVA Support). > > Would this suggest that Mozilla is about a quarter faster than netscape > now ? > > I'd be interested what others find. > > Cheers/2 > > Ed. > 7============================================== Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 21:00:40 +1030 From: Gregory Hicks Subject: Re: [os2genau] Interesting bandwith tester 2nd try 24.4.. probably cached locally now Ed Durrant wrote: > Checkout this site > > http://www.activeenzymes dot com dot au/bandwidth/ > > Interestingly enough I get different values depending which > browser I use. > > If I use Netscape 4.61 I get 1.6 MB/S > > If I Use Mozilla 0.96 however, I get 2.2 MB/S reported > > Using Opera just give garbage (probably lack of JAVA Support). > > Would this suggest that Mozilla is about a quarter faster than netscape > now ? > > I'd be interested what others find. > > Cheers/2 > > Ed. > 8============================================== Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 21:42:03 +1100 Subject: Re: [os2genau] Interesting bandwith tester From: Michael Block 873:-)) (Optus cable) On Sunday, December 9, 2001, at 09:23 PM, Gregory Hicks wrote: > 13.8... vvveeerrryyy sssssslllllllllooooooowwwwwww > > Ed Durrant wrote: > >> Checkout this site >> >> http://www.activeenzymes dot com dot au/bandwidth/ >> >> Interestingly enough I get different values depending which >> browser I use. >> >> If I use Netscape 4.61 I get 1.6 MB/S >> >> If I Use Mozilla 0.96 however, I get 2.2 MB/S reported >> >> Using Opera just give garbage (probably lack of JAVA Support). >> >> Would this suggest that Mozilla is about a quarter faster than netscape >> now ? >> >> I'd be interested what others find. >> >> Cheers/2 >> >> Ed. >> > > > regards Michael Block caca et declina medicus ------------------------------------> http://members.optushome dot com dot au/mblock/perinatal.html the www home of perinatal psychiatry