From: Digest To: "OS/2GenAu Digest" Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 00:01:07 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [os2genau_digest] No. 951 Reply-To: X-List-Unsubscribe: www.os2site.com/list/ ************************************************** Monday 04 October 2004 Number 951 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: hi speed USB ? : Voytek Eymont" 2 Re: hi speed USB ? : Mike O'Connor 3 Re: hi speed USB ? : Voytek Eymont" 4 Re: hi speed USB ? : Paul Smedley 5 Program not visible to PM : Peter L Allen" 6 Re: Program not visible to PM : Mike O'Connor 7 Time widget : Kev 8 Re: Time widget : Mike O'Connor 9 Re: Time widget - corrected version! : Mike O'Connor 10 Re: Program not visible to PM : Dennis Nolan **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 00:39:34 +1000 (EST) From: "Voytek Eymont" Subject: Re: hi speed USB ? Paul Smedley said: > Hi Voytek, > Voytek Eymont wrote: >> I've XCOPIED 280MB through old' USB in 6 minutes; >> XCOPYing same through 'new' USB still takes 6 minutes > > You also need a BASEDEV=USBEHCD.SYS in your config.sys for the USB 2.0 > controller... from the above looks like you're still running off the USB > 1.1 controller.. thanks, Paul. yes... I *did* see it in the readme, I *did* insert config.sys entry, it failed with 'no such file'; I then looked back at the USB stuff, and, couldn't find the USBEHCD.SYS.... so, I REMed it *now* that you pointed out, I unzipped the USB stack, guess what: now, I do have USBEHCD.SYS.... anyhow, now that I've found the USBEHCD.SYS... and, un-remed it..: I went from 6 minutes down to 1:40 ! thanks again, that was worth the effort of plugging in the card !! (meanwhile, I 'stuffed up' my ram stick: I was trying to format it as JFS, now, I can't even format as as HPFS, and, I can't remember how I done it in the 1st place...) -- Voytek ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 01:02:42 +1000 From: Mike O'Connor Subject: Re: hi speed USB ? Voytek Eymont wrote: >Paul Smedley said: > > >>Hi Voytek, >>Voytek Eymont wrote: >> >> > > > >>>I've XCOPIED 280MB through old' USB in 6 minutes; >>>XCOPYing same through 'new' USB still takes 6 minutes >>> >>> >>You also need a BASEDEV=USBEHCD.SYS in your config.sys for the USB 2.0 >>controller... from the above looks like you're still running off the USB >>1.1 controller.. >> >> > >thanks, Paul. > >yes... I *did* see it in the readme, I *did* insert config.sys entry, it >failed with 'no such file'; > >I then looked back at the USB stuff, and, couldn't find the USBEHCD.SYS... > >so, I REMed it > >*now* that you pointed out, I unzipped the USB stack, guess what: > >now, I do have USBEHCD.SYS.... > >anyhow, now that I've found the USBEHCD.SYS... and, un-remed it..: > >I went from 6 minutes down to 1:40 ! > > Hardly 40 times faster is it? Should have gone down to about 9 seconds! >thanks again, that was worth the effort of plugging in the card !! > >(meanwhile, I 'stuffed up' my ram stick: >I was trying to format it as JFS, now, I can't even format as as HPFS, >and, I can't remember how I done it in the 1st place...) > Hi Voytek, Did you try LVM /NEWMBR:# where # is the disk # allocated to it, followed by recreating the volume? -- Regards, Mike Failed the exam for -------------------- MCSE - Minesweeper Consultant and Solitaire Expert -------------------- [ISP blocks *.exe, *.cmd, *.bat, *.reg attachments] [Please use zipped versions of above] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- **= Email 3 ==========================** Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 08:27:54 +1000 (EST) From: "Voytek Eymont" Subject: Re: hi speed USB ? Mike O'Connor said: > Voytek Eymont wrote: > >>Paul Smedley said: > Hi Voytek, > > Did you try LVM /NEWMBR:# where # is the disk # allocated to it, > followed by recreating the volume? I'll, when I finish Palming on windoze also, LVM now shows several non -existing disks of 96MB....? on start, it says 'disk 3 not responding' 'disk 4..' really weired.... I'm showing all these pahntom HD...? -- Voytek ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- **= Email 4 ==========================** Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 09:01:07 +0930 From: Paul Smedley Subject: Re: hi speed USB ? Hi Voytek, Voytek Eymont wrote: > Mike O'Connor said: > >>Voytek Eymont wrote: >> >> >>>Paul Smedley said: > > > >>Hi Voytek, >> >>Did you try LVM /NEWMBR:# where # is the disk # allocated to it, >>followed by recreating the volume? > > > I'll, when I finish Palming on windoze > > also, LVM now shows several non -existing disks of 96MB....? > > on start, it says 'disk 3 not responding' 'disk 4..' > > really weired.... I'm showing all these pahntom HD...? probably because you (from memory) have /REMOVABLES:4 - this creates 4 drive letters even if the drive isn't connected... With cwUSBMSD I don't use /REMOVABLES at all and the card reader still works.. Cheers, Paul. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- **= Email 5 ==========================** Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 17:35:27 +1100 (EDT) From: "Peter L Allen" Subject: Program not visible to PM What' going on when a started program appears in the window list and Warpcentre list but can't be seen on the desktop. Seem to recall something being posted re similar some time back - another bit of handy stuff that didn't get filed! Regards, allenpl ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- **= Email 6 ==========================** Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 18:05:20 +1000 From: Mike O'Connor Subject: Re: Program not visible to PM Peter L Allen wrote: > What' going on when a started program appears in the window list and Warpcentre list but can't be seen on the desktop. > Seem to recall something being posted re similar some time back - another bit of handy stuff that didn't get filed! > Regards, > allenpl > > Hi Peter, If it isn't visible, the program window's "opened" position is probably off the screen completely - RMB on it in the Task-list and select CASCADE or TILE to make it visible again, then drag and resizr it to what you want. HTH -- Regards, Mike Failed the exam for -------------------- MCSE - Minesweeper Consultant and Solitaire Expert -------------------- [ISP blocks *.exe, *.cmd, *.bat, *.reg attachments] [Please use zipped versions of above] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- **= Email 7 ==========================** Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 16:08:44 +0000 From: Kev Subject: Time widget Hi all I have just been alerted that my e-mails are going out with the wrong time on them. I went to the "Locale" object and checked it all out and found 2 problems. 1. I have set it for 24hr format, but the widget shows in 12hr format. Does anyone know what I've done wrong? 2. Can anyone give me a clue as to why the time stamp on top of my e-mails is wrong. BTW, my eCentre colck widget says 04:08:xx PM. Compare that with the time stamp you receive. Thanx in advance Kev DOwnes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- **= Email 8 ==========================** Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 18:20:53 +1000 From: Mike O'Connor Subject: Re: Time widget Kev wrote: > Hi all > > I have just been alerted that my e-mails are going out with the wrong > time on them. I went to the "Locale" object and checked it all out > and found 2 problems. > > 1. I have set it for 24hr format, but the widget shows in 12hr format. > Does anyone know what I've done wrong? > > 2. Can anyone give me a clue as to why the time stamp on top of my > e-mails is wrong. BTW, my eCentre colck widget says 04:08:xx PM. > Compare that with the time stamp you receive. > > Thanx in advance Hi Kev, After you have set the locale to 12 or 24 hour you then have to click on "Mark as default" on the "Action" menu there! The WarpCenter/eComCenter clock doesn't take effect until after a REBOOT, unlike the Object Desktop Digital Clock display! From your headers this is what shows up here : [2.08 P.M. in INBOX [os2genau folder]] Delivery-date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 18:08:51 +1000 <<------------ this is correct AEST time] Received: from [202.136.32.34] (helo=postoffice01.mail-hub.kbs dot net dot au) by mail02.mail-hub.kbs dot net dot au with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #6) id 1CENtr-0003hU-00 for mikeoc at dodo dot com dot au; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 18:08:51 +1000 Received: from [210.8.201.190] (helo=gateway1 dot comkal dot net) by postoffice01.mail-hub.kbs dot net dot au with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CENtt-0000y4-RJ for mikeoc at dodo dot com dot au; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 18:08:54 +1000 Received: from ckfw dot comkal dot net (ckfw3 dot comkal dot net [192.168.1.9]) by mail. (Weasel v1.71); 04 Oct 2004 18:08:52 +1000 Received: from mail25.syd.optusnet dot com dot au (mail25.syd.optusnet dot com dot au [211.29.133.166]) by mail. (Weasel v1.71) for ; 04 Oct 2004 18:08:48 +1000 Received: from [211.29.212.221] (welax11-221.dialup.optusnet dot com dot au [211.29.212.221]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail25.syd.optusnet dot com dot au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9488gpL004196 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 18:08:43 +1000 <<------- agrees with time I got it Message-ID: <4161758C.7040408 at optusnet dot com dot au> Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 16:08:44 +0000 should read 16:08:44 +0800 not +0000 [means TZ offset not known/unable to be determined] What do you have for SET TZ= in config.sys? HTH -- Regards, Mike Failed the exam for -------------------- MCSE - Minesweeper Consultant and Solitaire Expert -------------------- [ISP blocks *.exe, *.cmd, *.bat, *.reg attachments] [Please use zipped versions of above] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- **= Email 9 ==========================** Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 18:33:09 +1000 From: Mike O'Connor Subject: Re: Time widget - corrected version! {stuffed the times up on this last one!] ** NEW below Kev wrote: > Hi all > > I have just been alerted that my e-mails are going out with the wrong > time on them. I went to the "Locale" object and checked it all out > and found 2 problems. > > 1. I have set it for 24hr format, but the widget shows in 12hr format. > Does anyone know what I've done wrong? > > 2. Can anyone give me a clue as to why the time stamp on top of my > e-mails is wrong. BTW, my eCentre colck widget says 04:08:xx PM. > Compare that with the time stamp you receive. > > Thanx in advance Hi Kev, After you have set the locale to 12 or 24 hour you then have to click on "Mark as default" on the "Action" menu there! The WarpCenter/eComCenter clock doesn't take effect until after a REBOOT, unlike the Object Desktop Digital Clock display! From your headers this is what shows up here : [2.08 P.M. in INBOX [os2genau folder]] **That should have read 2:08 A.M. on the 5th - tomorrow morning!! so the 16:08:44 is taken as that time in UTC - which is 02:08 tomorrow here in AEST or 00:08 in W.A. tomorrow. Delivery-date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 18:08:51 +1000 <<------------ this is correct AEST time] Received: from [202.136.32.34] (helo=postoffice01.mail-hub.kbs dot net dot au) by mail02.mail-hub.kbs dot net dot au with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #6) id 1CENtr-0003hU-00 for mikeoc at dodo dot com dot au; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 18:08:51 +1000 Received: from [210.8.201.190] (helo=gateway1 dot comkal dot net) by postoffice01.mail-hub.kbs dot net dot au with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CENtt-0000y4-RJ for mikeoc at dodo dot com dot au; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 18:08:54 +1000 Received: from ckfw dot comkal dot net (ckfw3 dot comkal dot net [192.168.1.9]) by mail. (Weasel v1.71); 04 Oct 2004 18:08:52 +1000 Received: from mail25.syd.optusnet dot com dot au (mail25.syd.optusnet dot com dot au [211.29.133.166]) by mail. (Weasel v1.71) for ; 04 Oct 2004 18:08:48 +1000 Received: from [211.29.212.221] (welax11-221.dialup.optusnet dot com dot au [211.29.212.221]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail25.syd.optusnet dot com dot au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9488gpL004196 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 18:08:43 +1000 <<------- agrees with time I got it Message-ID: <4161758C.7040408 at optusnet dot com dot au> Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 16:08:44 +0000 should read 16:08:44 +0800 not +0000 [means TZ offset not known/unable to be determined] What do you have for SET TZ= in config.sys? **Do you have a copy of Peter Moylen's TZSET03.ZIP? There's a copy I put on the files area on os2user or maybe ecomstation at Yahoo, if you're still subscribed. HTH -- Regards, Mike Failed the exam for -------------------- MCSE - Minesweeper Consultant and Solitaire Expert -------------------- [ISP blocks *.exe, *.cmd, *.bat, *.reg attachments] [Please use zipped versions of above] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- **= Email 10 ==========================** Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 20:10:45 +1000 From: Dennis Nolan Subject: Re: Program not visible to PM I usually right click the desktop and then clisk cascade. Seems that sometimes applications can start way off the desktop viewport. Regards Dennis. Peter L Allen wrote: > What' going on when a started program appears in the window list and >Warpcentre list but can't be seen on the desktop. > Seem to recall something being posted re similar some time back - another bit >of handy stuff that didn't get filed! > Regards, > allenpl > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------