From: Digest To: "OS/2GenAu Digest" Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 00:00:29 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [os2genau_digest] No. 1425 Reply-To: X-List-Unsubscribe: www.os2site.com/list/ ************************************************** Monday 22 January 2007 Number 1425 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: Object identifier for Network folder : Michael/Gail Peters" 2 Trap 0000 from Firefox and Thunderbird : Ed Durrant **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 07:26:20 +1100 From: "Michael/Gail Peters" Subject: Re: Object identifier for Network folder I discovered in my endeavours to resolve this problem that the icon page of the folder properties has a new option at the bottom, called details. In there I read that there is no objectid for this icon, but that it is still part of the same dll name. I expect it has been recompiled. So... I'll try to give it an id. The same situation exists for the network utilities folder. Why would eCS do this? Mike ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael/Gail Peters" To: Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:43 AM Subject: Object identifier for Network folder I am trying to update my rexx program for recovery of peer networking icons for eCS 1.2, the changed loading pattern from OS/2 4.52 requiring this. However, I cannot find the ID for the network folder and network services. I'm using Getset for the ini examination. Can anybody point me in the right direction? Mike [attachments have been removed] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- =============== ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:27:54 +1100 From: Ed Durrant Subject: Trap 0000 from Firefox and Thunderbird Over the last week, my system has been repeatably failing with TRAP000 errors while running either Firefox 2.001 or Thunderbird version 2.0 alpha 1. Both are running in their own environment using the RUN! program. I suspect there is however a DLL that has been changed in both these programs that is the common reason for the problem. I would not recommend upgrading to either of these versions for the time being - I know some people are running FF 2.001 without issues, however is anyone here running TB 2.0A ? Cheers/2 Ed. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------