Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 16:27:08 -0500 From: madodel at ptdprolog.net Subject: [VOICENWS] SW: USB Scanners for Tame 0.96 From: Klaus Staedtler Tame 0.96 will be a PM-Frontend for Sane, it is currently as Release Candidate at our beta testers. It will be officially available as soon We got the confirmation from our testers and the NLS-files (it will be available in english, german, japanese, russian and swedish). As there will be a Tame USB version too containing Sane Epson USB (relying on latest sane 1.0.11 build, unfortunately with the bugs in there too, by Maeda Haruyuki) it would be nice to have as many as possible Epson USB Scanners supported out of the box. If anybody has one of the following scanners please drop me a note (please _don't_ ask for others, you are only increasing our workload and will get no reply), so I can send you a sane USB build for testing your scanner and getting the scanner-specific settings into Tame. > EPSON USB-Scanner Product ID > 0x101, /* Perfection 636U and 636Photo. Not tested. > 0x103, /* Perfection 610. Not tested. > 0x10c, /* Perfection 640U. Not tested. > 0x104, /* Perfection 1200U and 1200Photo. Not tested. > 0x10b, /* Perfection 1240U. Not tested. > 0x106, /* Stylus Scan 2500. Not tested. > 0x107, /* Expression 1600. Not tested. > 0x10e, /* Expression 1680. Not tested. > 0x110, /* Perfection 1650. Not tested. > 0x11b, /* Perfection 2400 Photo. Not tested. > 0x11c, /* Perfection 3200(GT-9800) Not tested. > 0x11e, /* Perfection 1660 Photo. Not tested. > 0x801, /* CX-5200 Not Tested. > 0x802, /* CX-3200 Not Tested. The following scanners are tested and working: > 0x10a, /* Perfection 1640SU and 1640SU Photo > 0x112, /* Perfection 2450(GT-9700F) Klaus Staedtler -- To unsubscribe yourself from this list, send the following message to majormajor at os2voice.org unsubscribe news end If you have an announcement you would like posted to the VOICE News list, please send it to submit at os2voice.org. Please include a valid reply address and a real contact name. If you wish to comment on this post, please reply to feedback at os2voice.org